Home India For 7 years, I religiously waited for some evidence, but all in...

For 7 years, I religiously waited for some evidence, but all in vain: Special CBI judge


Special CBI choose OP Saini on The rued that despite having “religiously” devoted seven years to 2G scam cases, no “legally admittible evidence” was placed by before him by the C.B.I.
The decide created the remark in his finding of fact acquitting former telecommunication minister A Raja, DMK MP Kanimozhi and many others, as well as high company honchos, in 3 separate cases probed by the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

“I may add that for the last regarding seven years, on all operating days, summer vacation enclosed, I religiously Sabbatum within the open Court from 10am to 5pm, awaiting for somebody with some de jure admittible proof in his possession, however bushed vain,” Saini aforementioned in his one,552 page finding of fact within the CBI’s case involving Raja et al..

The court of the special decide had get being on March fourteen, 2011 in pursuance of a Supreme writ for solelyhearing all the cases arising out of the 2G scam probe.

In his (1552)-page judgement within the CBI’s case involving Raja et al., Saini additionally noted that rumour, gossip and speculation created the general public perception regarding the cases however this has no place in judicial proceedings.

“Not one soul turned up. this means that everyone was going by public perception created by rumour, gossip and speculation. However, public perception has no place in judicial proceedings,” the court aforementioned.

‘CBI’s well-choreographed chargesheet had incorrect facts’

The special decide aforementioned that within the CBI’s chargesheet filed against former telecommunicationminister A Raja et al., incorrect facts were recorded and that they were entitled to be let loose.

“The upshot of the higher than discussion is that, I even have fully no hesitation in holding that the prosecution (CBI) has miserably did not prove any charge against any of the suspect, created in its well choreographed rap sheet,” the court aforementioned.
“I might add that several facts recorded within the chargesheet area unit factually incorrect, like Finance Secretary powerfully recommending revision of entry fee, deletion of a clause of draft LOI (letter of intent) by A Raja, recommendations of TRAI (Telecom administrative body of India) for revision of entry fee etc,” Saini aforementioned.
The court additionally recorded its “deep appreciation” for the lawyers for his or her help within the complicatedcase.

“I additionally record my deep appreciation for advocates for each parties for the toil place in by them throughout the trial of this voluminous, technical and sophisticated case, the record of that runs into regarding threefour animal product pages,” the decide aforementioned.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here